2nd Year Inorganic Chemistry
Must be familiar with atomic properties, definitions, variations across the periods and down groups and be able to rationalise these trends.
Topics: physical properties, covalent/ionic bonding, oxidation states, allotropy, conductivity, bond energies, catenation, partial and full multiple bonding, electron deficient bonding, colour, simple compounds (oxides, halides, complexes).
Effective Nuclear Charge (Zeff)
across, generally no change down (except from 2s/2p to 3s/3p)
d- and f-Block Contraction
Pairing of 3p/4p and 5p/6p properties (radii, IE etc.)
e.g. covalent radii (pm):
B Al Ga In Tl
0.88 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.55
Atomic Radii
¯ across, down (related to Zeff, etc.)
Ionisation Energy (IE)
across, ¯ down
Anomalies across table due to stability of half-filled shell.
e.g. group 16 lower than expected: np4 ® np3
Electron Affinity
across, ¯ down
Anomalies as above due to half-filled shells.
Electronegativity (c )
across, ¯ down (Pauling scale used)
Very useful property in predicting the nature of elements and their compounds.
Anomalies due to d- and f-block contractions (e.g. Ga>Al).
ox. state, electronegativity, (e.g. Tl(III) 2.04, Tl(I) 1.62)
Large decrease in electronegativity between period 2 and period 3, then much smaller decrease down each group.
Also, electronegativity increase in the sequence sp3<sp2<sp. Electrons are more tightly held in s orbitals.
Ionic and Covalent Bonding
Bonding not usually clear cut, ionic/covalent are extreme cases:
Molecular solids/liquids ® polymeric solids ® lattices
Ionic bonding is due to the attraction of oppositely charged ions e.g. M+X-. Properties include: high mp, conduct electricity when molten or in solution, solids have regular crystalline lattice structures to maximise the ion-ion contacts (close packing of spheres), hard, brittle and dissolve only in polar solvents.
Covalent bonding is the sharing of valence electrons which are attracted to the positively charged nuclei of the atoms. Covalent compounds are molecular, gases, liquids or low melting solids which act as electrical insulators and dissolve in non-polar solvents (e.g. hydrocarbons).
Polar covalent bonding is intermediate (and most common) case. Compounds normally adopt 3D networks, layers, chains. Generally high mp, softer and less brittle than ionic solids. Dissolve in polar solvents. Only some are conductors in solution.
Three numbers give a guide to nature of the bond.
(1) Electronegativity
A rough guide is: if the difference in electronegativity between two elements is >1.7 it has predominately ionic character.
e.g. Be(1.6)-----F(4.0) difference 4.0-1.6=2.4 \ ionic
Be(1.6)----Cl(3.2) difference 3.2-1.6=1.6 \ Polar covalent
Pure covalent are homonuclear like O2 or F2 (difference is zero). No such thing as pure ionic, only a degree of character.
i.e. Na(0.9)------F(4.0) difference 3.1, but X-ray and theoretical data indicate some electron density between the atoms (not all on F) \ some covalent character.
A useful way to visualise the relationship between
electronegativity and the nature of the bonding between elements is the
van Arkel-Ketalaar triangle.
Plot D c against å c where D c = (c B - c A) and å c = (c B + c A)/2

Large D c - ionic - lattices.
Medium D c - polar covalent - polymeric or macromolecular.
Small D c - If low S c then metallic. Small attraction between the valence electrons and the nuclei leads to delocalisation (e.g. Cs, Ca). If high S c then non-polar covalent. Large attraction between the nuclei and the valence electrons leads to localised bonding (e.g. F2, O2).
(2) Ionisation Energy
Low values indicate a tendency to form ionic bonding.
i.e. releases electrons readily.
S IE1+2
Be 27.5 eV unlikely to lose 2 e-s totally so some covalent aspect.
Ca 18.0 eV more likely to give ionic compounds.
When two elements combine, one with a low IE (e.g. Cs, K, Ca etc.) and the second with a high electron affinity (e.g. O, F, Cl etc.) very polar bonds are formed i.e. ionic compounds.
Trend: compounds of the electropositive elements become more ionic as group is descended. Also, lower ox. states gives more ionic character (less electrons to share).
(3) Lattice Energy
Small ions pack well in a lattice. Energetically favourable since this maximises the number of positive ion-negative ion contacts. High lattice energies promote formation of ionic solids.
e.g. MgF2 - Mg has high S
IE1+2 but it and F are small, pack well \
ionic.
Energetics of Ionic Bonding for NaCl

Orbital and Electron Promotion Energies
Useful in rationalising oxidation states, conductivity etc.
In general, orbitals with the same principal quantum
number (e.g. 2 for 2s/2p, 3 for 3s/3p) have similar energies. Note that
the d-orbitals for the 3p elements and below are similar in energy to the
s and p orbitals: available for promotion of electrons (increases in ox.
states) and coordination of ligands (increase in coordination number).
Approximate orbital energies
Electron promotional energies
e.g. for B: 2s22p1 ® 2s12p12p1

Note: promotional energy is important for covalent bonding (sharing of electrons) while ionisation energy is important for ionic bonding.
Trend: the energy required to promote an electron from an s to a p orbital increases down a group. Important for stability of ox. states.
Oxidation and Valence States
Octet Rule: tendency for main group atoms in covalent molecules to achieve a full octet, 8 electrons (noble gas configuration). Generally most important for 2nd row elements.
Oxidation state is the formal charge on an atom in a molecule if the electrons are assigned to the more electronegative atom in a bond.
e.g. PF5: P5+ F-, NH3: N3- H+, NF3: N3+ F- (only a formalism!!)
Ox. states written as 4+, 3- or IV, -III (interchangeable)
No oxidation state for element-element bonds.
e.g. Cl2: Cl0 Also, N2F4: N2+ F-
But for N three electrons are used in bonding i.e.
the valency of N is three. Sometimes valency is more useful than ox. state!
Common Ox. States
| Group | 1 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| Ox. State | 1 | 2 | 3, 1 | 4, 2 | 5, 3,-3 | 6, 4, 2, -2 | -1 | 0 |
Group 1
+1 most common.
-1 available in the anions M- from the disproportion reaction:
2M(s)
M+ + M-
Very strong ligands such as crown ethers (see later) stabilise the cations.
Group 2
+2 most common.
Why no M+1?
Theoretically D Hform of M+1 compounds is favoured over the elements!
i.e. Mg(s) + 1/2Cl2(g) ® MgCl(s) D Hform -125 kJmol-1
BUT
Mg(s) + Cl2 ® MgCl2(s) D Hform -642 kJmol-1
MgCl2 is far more stable (mainly due to higher lattice energy since smaller, more charged M+2 cf M+1) so disproportionation takes place:
2MgCl(s) ® Mg(s) + MgCl2(s) D Hform -392 kJmol-1
\ Don’t get M+1 compounds.
Group 13
Most common +3, +1
Trend: lower oxidation state becomes more stable going down the group.
Inert pair effect
Two factors combine:
For Boron, B-X bonds are short and strong, and PE for s® p is relatively small \ 2 extra E(B-X)>PE \ trivalent.
But for Thallium, Tl-X bonds are long and weak, and PE for s® p is relatively large \ 2 extra E(B-X)<PE \ monovalent
BCl3 is very stable but:
TlCl3 ®
TiCl + Cl2 at 40 °
C
Energy diagram representation:

Ox. state 3 favourable Ox. state 1 favourable
Group 14
Common ox. states: +4, +2, e.g. SnCl4, CO2, PbCl2, SnO.
Again the inert pair effect leads to the lower ox. state becoming progressively more stable down the group.
Group 15
Common ox. states: +5, +3, -3 e.g. PCl3, PCl5, Li3N
Inert pair effect again!
High positive ox. states only available in combination with very electronegative elements e.g. O, F, i.e. high energy from formation of strong bonds offsets promotional energy.
e.g. PF5 is known but PI5 does not exist. Impossible to fit five large iodines round a single phosphorus!
-3 state available (due to increasing electronegativity as we go along a period) in combination with the electropositive metals. e.g. Li3N
Hypervalency
Where more than eight electrons fill the valence shell of a main group atom. Octet rule no longer obeyed!
e.g. ns2p1p1p1 ® ns1p1p1p1d1d1
valency: 3 5
e.g. PF5 where No. electrons at P is 10!
Low lying d orbitals are used for bonding in hypervalent molecules (non available for period 2 elements).
Group 16
Common ox. states: +6, +4, +2, -2 e.g. SF6, SeCl4, SCl2, H2O, Li2S
ns2p2p1p1 ® ns2p1p1p1d1 ® ns1p1p1p1d1d1
Valency 2 4 6
Again high positive ox. states only in combination with O and F.
Group 17
Most common ox. state is -1 (by far) e.g. LiCl, MgCl2
However, in combination with electronegative atoms ox. states of 1, 3, 5 and 7 can be formed.
IF IF3 IF5 IF7
ns2p2p2p1 ® ns2p2p1p1d1 ® ns2p1p1p1d1d1 ® ns1p1p1p1d1d1d1
Valency: 1 3 5 7
Trend: The higher ox. states can only be formed by the elements at the bottom of the group!
The higher ox. states are relatively unstable but can be formed by the heavier elements. This is mainly due the larger size of atoms allowing higher coordination numbers.
Group 18
Common ox. state 0 e.g. Ne, Xe
As with halogens, can form others (2, 4, 6, 8 by promotion of the electrons into empty d-orbitals) with very electronegative groups (XeF2, XeO4).
Xe XeO XeO2 XeO3 XeO4
ns2p2p2p2 ® ns2p2p2p1d1 ® ns2p2p1p1d1d1 ® ns2p1p1p1d1d1d1 ® ns1p1p1p1d1d1d1d1
Valency: 0 2 4 6 8
Second Row Anomalies
Marked difference in properties between 2nd row (Li-Ne) and 3rd row (Na-Ar) elements.
For 2nd row:
(1) 2nd row elements have only a 1s2 core shell shielding the outer electrons. This leads to high Zeff, IE, c , small radii and contracted atomic orbitals. Also, the 2s and 2p orbitals are closer in energy and size compared to the 3s and 3p orbitals.
Effects: very efficient overlap of orbitals between 2nd row elements - strong bonds (allotropes, multiple bonding stable).
(2) Also, no low lying d orbitals for 2nd row elements.
Effects: limits oxidation number and coordination
numbers to maximum of 4 (1s + 3p orbitals). Limits reactivity since no
coordination sites available in compounds.
Allotropy
Different structural forms of the same element leads to very different chemical and physical properties.
General trend: Bottom left - metals, top right - non-metals, diagonal in p-block from B to Te - metalloids. Follows electronegativities.
Groups 1 and 2
All metals with either body-centred cubic, face-centred cubic or hexagonal close-packed structures.
Group 13
Boron is a metalloid (semiconductor). High electronegativity results in strong covalent B-B bonds. Iscosahedral B12 polyhedra linked in 3D network. Forms multicentre bonds which are electron deficient (see later).
12 corners, 20 triangular faces. 2nd hardest element.

Gallium forms strong Ga-Ga pairs which interact weakly with six other Ga atoms (metalloid, structure related to I2).
Cross-section through Ga.
Al, In and Tl all form metallic lattices.
The metalloid nature of Ga but not Al is due to the d-block contraction, electronegativity Ga>Al and so some extra covalent character - localised bonding.
Group 14
Shows clear trend for covalent to metallic character as ¯ group.
Carbon - non metal.
Diamond: 3D network, tetrahedral carbons, strong
sp3 bonds, insulator, 2-centre 2-electron bonds.

Graphite: layers of stacked hexagonal rings. sp2
bonds allowing p -bonding
perpendicular to sheets – conductor (unique for a non-metal)!

Fullerenes: molecular carbon - cages. sp2 carbons in hexagonal and pentagonal rings (needed for cage closure). Localised double and single bonds.
Si and Ge: metalloids with diamond structure. Semiconductor properties (see later).
Sn: Two forms.
Grey: diamond structure - mainly covalent.
White: interactions with more than four nearest neighbours - more metallic.
Pb: metallic.
Group 15
N: covalent molecular gas with a strong triple bond Nº N.
P: Three main forms, all contain three coordinate P with single P-P bonds. P2 (Pº P) only at high temps and low pressure.
White: discrete P4 tetrahedra.

Red: Polymeric linked P4 units. Denser, higher mp, less reactive. Less strain in structure.
Black: most thermodynamically stable, layers of linked six-membered rings in a chair conformation.
As, Sb, Bi: all adopt hexagonal sheet structures similar to black P. At high pressures can convert Sb and Bi into metallic lattices.
In the layer structures of P, As, Sb and Bi each atom has three close neighbours and also three longer contacts to atoms in the next layer.
Trend: as the group is descended the ratio of long
to short bonds decreases (become almost equal in length). Transition from
localised covalent to more delocalised metallic bonding (consistent with
lower c ).
Group 16
O: molecular, gaseous dioxygen with a double bond O=O. Also, ozone, O3 with multiple bonding.
S, Se: all single bonds as rings (S8, Se8) or polymeric chains Sn, Sen.
Te: Only chains as above.
Po: metallic (cubic with six nearest neighbours).
Trend: again the chain structures the interchain bond lengths decrease as the table is descended - more metallic.
Group17
All diatomic gases with a single element-element bond.
Under normal conditions: F2, Cl2 are gases, Br2 is a liquid and I2 is a solid. Trend is due to increasing van der Waals (or dipole-dipole ) interactions as the atoms become more easier to polarise.
Low temp solid state structures of the elements are similar - sheets.
Again trend towards smaller interlayer bond lengths down the group - more metallic.
Consistent with high pressure form of I2
which becomes a conductor - forcing atoms together induces overlap of orbitals.

Group 18
Monoatomic, non-metallic.
Structural relationship between Allotropes
Starting from diamond (group 14) (a): add an electron to each atom to produce a lone pair and break one bond - structure of black P, As, Sb, Bi (group 15) (b): add another electron to form a second lone pair and break another bond - structure of S, Se, Te (group 16) (c): add another electron to form a third lone pair and break another bond - structure of the halogens (group 17).
Physical / chemical differences between white and red P
Use this as an example to illustrate consequences
of structure on properties.
| White | Red |
| P4 tetrahedra,
soft and wax-like,
translucent, density 1.82 gcm-3, ignites in air, soluble in hydrocarbons, poisonous, non-conductor. |
polymeric chains, powder,
red, density 2.61 gcm-3,
stable in air, insoluble, non-poisonous, semi-conductor. |
These points highlight the differences between molecular
and polymeric materials:
Molecular compounds are more volatile with lower melting points. Weaker van der Waals forces holding the molecules together.
Molecular compounds are more soluble in organic solvents. Again due to weak van der Waals.
Polymers and infinite structures are harder and more dense. More effective packing of atoms.
Molecular compounds are more reactive. Rate of departure of a molecule from the solid is easier (weaker bonding) therefore can react quicker.
Conductivity
Metals: conductors, non-metals: insulators, metalloids: semiconductors.
Simple picture for conductivity in metals is the
sea of electrons model, where the positive metal ions are surrounded by
the valence electron which are free to move - hence conduct electricity.
The electrons act as electrostatic glue holding the cations together. Malleability
comes from delocalised bonding in all directions. Also, metallic strength
increases with number of bonding electrons, Al>Na. Lustre of metal comes
from mobile electrons interacting with light.
Band Theory
Molecular orbitals form between two atoms when their atomic orbitals overlap. When the orbitals of three or more atoms combine the electrons within them are said to be delocalised. In systems with many overlapping orbitals such as metals they crowd together into bands.
e.g. For Na

Build up metal - two atoms combine their 3s orbitals to form one bonding and one antibonding orbital. This process continues to form a bonding (valence) band and an antibonding (conductance) band which are separated by an energy gap (band gap). Cannot move electrons when the valence band if filled. However, in a metal the band gap is small and it requirenly a small amount of energy to promote an electron into the unoccupied band. This leaves ‘holes’ in the valence band and allows electrical conductivity.
For metals increasing temperature results in decreasing
conductivity due to increased scattering of electrons (i.e. flow not only
in direction of applied charge). However, for semi-conductors where the
band gap is relatively large, temperature rise allows excitation of electrons
between the levels and gives a dramatic increase in conductivity!

Doping Semiconductors. Adding impurities can greatly affect conductivity of semiconductors.
e.g. n-type doping: Adding a small amount of a group 15 element such as P into a group 14 semiconductor such as Si results in P occupying the normal tetrahedral sites but with an additional electron available in the conduction band – higher conductivity.
p-type doping: Adding a group 13 element such as
B to Si again results in B in tetrahedral positions but with only three
electrons available for bonding – holes in valence band – higher conductivity.

Trends
For metals both thermal and electrical conductivities generally increase along a period which is directly related to the number of valence electrons available (Al>Mg>Na). Little variation down a group.
For non-metals (group 14 onwards) conductivity increases down a group due to larger, more diffuse orbitals (less directional) used to bond the elements together and the band gap becomes smaller (more delocalised bonding, more metallic character down group).
Another way to view this is through the electronegativity of the elements.
High electronegativity – insulators (electrons are stabilised in strong bonds and unable to move).
Low electronegativity – conductors (electrons are only loosely bond and may move).
Intermediate electronegativity – semiconductors.
Illustrate with group 14:
C as diamond is highly crystalline and an insulator and inert due to very strong C-C bonding. In graphite the delocalised electrons within the sheets allows a degree of electrical conductivity (unique conducting non-metal).
Si and Ge have a grey/blue metallic colour. Both adopt the diamond structure but are more volatile due to weaker, longer bonds. Both are semi-conductors, lower conductivity than a metal but increases with temperature.
Sn and Pb are low mp metals. Sn has two allotropes: a -Sn (metallic) and grey b -Sn (diamond, with semi-metal properties).
Resistivity: Diamond 1014
Si
48 Ge 47 Sn 11x10-6 Pb 20x10-6
(ohm cm at 20 °
C)
Superconductivity
A material which has zero electrical resistance when
cooled to a definite temperature. It conducts electricity without heat
loss and conducts infinitely! It is also perfectly diamagnetic which leads
to repulsion of any magnetic field (levitation of magnets - superfast trains!).
Usually made of complex ceramics e.g. YBa2Cu3O7.
Also, found for metal doped fullerenes e.g. K3C60.
Also for many metals at very low temperatures e.g. Hg at 4K.
Bonding in Compounds
So far only considered a bond where an electron pair
is shared between two atoms. However, many instances where this is not
the case.
Electron Deficient Bonding (multicentre bonding)
An electron deficient molecule has fewer valence electrons involved in bonding than the number of valence orbitals available.
Compounds of groups 1, 2 and 13 form many electron deficient structures.
e.g. Diborane, B2H6
14 valence orbitals (2x4 from B, and 1x6 from H) but only 12 valence electrons (2x3 from B, and 1x6 from H). So not simple 2-centre 2-electron bonds (No. valence orbitals = No. valence electrons).
Solution: Terminal bonds are 2c-2e (4x2) leaves six electrons to cover four bridging bonds. Take the bridging bonds to contain one orbital over three atoms B-H-B and fill with two electrons each (2x2) i.e. three-centre two electron bonds.
Consider each boron atom to be sp3 hybridised and have two electrons in each B-H-B bond.
Organometallic examples:
Group 1: MeLi is a colourless, crystalline solid with fairly low mp and can be sublimed (most covalent character in group). It is soluble in organic solvents such as ether and does not conduct electricity when molten. Organolithiums form molecular, discrete structures (not ionic lattices like lithium halides).
e.g. Methyl lithium is a tetramer (MeLi)4

Tetrahedron with four faces. Each Me sits over one face and hence bonds to three lithiums. Carbon is formally six coordinate!
Has electron deficient bonding: 12 C-Li bonds \ should be 24 e-s but only 8 available (4 from C and 4 from Li) so bond order is 8/24 = 1/3 \ highly reactive (needs e-s).
Other aggregation states include hexamers such as (BunLi)6.
The rest of group 1 methyl derivatives form networks or lattices (more ionic).
Group 2: Me2Be (again most covalent
in group - not ionic). Both Me2Be and Me2Mg form
polymeric chains with five coordinate carbon. Rest of group are networks
or ionic lattices.

Group 13: Now all Me3M compounds
are predominately covalent. All are liquids or gases under normal conditions.
Me3Al undergoes a monomer dimer equilibrium in solution. Again
3c-2e bonding for methyls.

Groups 14-17: Generally molecular covalent compounds which are liquids or gases e.g. CMe4, AsMe5, Me2Se.
Trend: Organometallics are generally more ionic down
a group and less ionic going across table.
Coordinate Bonds (or dative bonds)
This is the linkage of two atoms by a pair of electrons,
both electrons being provided by one of the atoms (the donor). Usually
a lone pair from one atom fills an empty orbital on the second atom.

usually written as A ¬ D or A.D
Lewis acid Lewis base
(e- pair acceptor) (e- pair donor)
Examples of complex formation:
(a) neutral - H3N:® BCl3
where donors can be ethers R2O, amines R3N, phosphines R3P etc. (all contain a lone pair). The boron has an empty p-orbital which makes it a Lewis acid.
Also, SiF4.2Pyridine. Empty low-lying
d orbitals available for coordination.

Dative bonds can also form bridges to give polymers.
e.g. BeCl2
(b) anionic - usually donor anionic, acceptor neutral.
H- ® AlH3 giving AlH4- others BF4-, AlF63-
(c) cationic - H3N ® H+ to give NH4+ others H3O+
Important in aqueous chemistry get (H2O)n
®
Mn+ usually written Mn+(aq).
Multiple p Bonding
(a) Full p -bonds (double, triple) are common in period 2 (C, O, N) using 2p orbitals. e.g. C=C, C=O, Cº C, Nº N, N=O. Some of the strongest bonds in table! – CO, N2.
2s/2p orbitals are similar in size and energy and
therefore hybridise well. Also, mixing of 2s/2p orbitals on adjacent atoms
is highly efficient (small and localised due to high Zeff) and
form strong bonds. Not for period 3 and below which have larger, more diffuse
orbitals. So only very weak Si=Si, As=As etc.

Example: Clear difference between N and P is diatomic N2 vs tetrahedral P4. Due to difference in relative bond strengths.
Nº N 946 (kJmol-1) Pº P 490
N=N 418 P=P 310
N-N 167 P-P 200
\ Triple bond preferred for N but not P (3x167 < 946 but 3x200 > 490). Hence P forms three single bonds in preference to one triple one.
(b) Partial p -bonds (strengthened single bonds)
These are ‘dative’ p
-bonds. Can be pp
-pp .

B-F in BF3 is 130pm, expected 152pm for purely single bond.
Atom p donating can be hal, O, S, N, etc.
Can also have pp -dp but only in period 3 and below when d-orbitals are available.
e.g. In POCl3 get P-O of 145pm, expected
176.

Radicals: weak single bonds (due to lone pair repulsions) and strong multiple bonding leads to radical formation.
e.g. NO
Homonuclear Bond Energies
Only considering element-element single bond energies.
Trend: Generally bonds become weaker as a group is descended. Atoms are larger and poorer overlap of diffuse orbitals.
Anomalies: Weaker bonds for N, O and F than P, S and Cl!
Rationalisation: The atoms N, O and F all have at
least one lone pair and their small atomic radii leads to short bonds with
one another and therefore large inter-electron repulsions - bonds weaker
than expected! From row three down the atoms are larger and the lone pairs
on each atom are further apart - stronger bonding compared to second row.

Trend: Across the periods there is an increase in bond energy from group 1 to 14, then a drop at group 15, followed by an increase.
Rationalisation: bonding strength increases with increasing electronegativity but a blip at group 15 when lone pairs first destabilise the bonds.
Catenation: the ability of an element to form element-element bonds. Related to homonuclear bond strength.
Trend: Generally decreases down a group.
Anomalies at N and O due to lone pair-lone pair repulsions limiting catenation.
Note: consider binding energy of the elements in their natural forms (not just a single bond).
X2(S) ® 2X(g) (diatomic molecule)
Xn(S) ® nX(g) (solid)
Trend: Increase from group 1 to group 14 then decrease
to group 18.
Related to the number of valence electrons available for bonding. i.e. 1 to 4 for groups 1 to 14, then 3 to 0 for groups 15 to 18 (introduction of lone pairs). This energy is reflected in the elements properties: mp, hard or soft etc.
Heteronuclear Bond Energies
Trend: Generally much stronger then homonuclear bonds.
Rationalisation: heteronuclear bonds are polarised (d + d -) due to the difference in electronegativity between the atoms. Therefore these bonds contain a degree of ionic character (extra stabilisation through electrostatics).
Trends:
No clear trend down groups 1 and 2 but energies are higher in group 2 (higher lattice energies due to 2+ charge and smaller size).
Groups 13 - 17 decrease down group due to larger size of atoms (weaker bonding). Some anomalies at 2nd row (partial p -bonding, pp -dp for Si, P, S).
Across from 13-17 energies decrease due to less ionic contribution to bonding (electronegativities are becoming closer).
Origin of Colour
If a compound absorbs light in the visible region
of the spectrum it appears coloured. Absorption of light results in the
electronic transition of an electron in a molecule from one energy level
to another.

The number and size of the transitions determines the colour of the compound.
Absorption in one region results in showing the transmitted light as the complementary colour.
e.g. absorb red: compound appears blue-green.
In ionic compounds the large electronegativity difference between the atoms results in a large separation between the highest energy occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest energy unfilled molecular orbital (LUMO). Therefore the promotion of an electron requires a large amount of energy and the compounds appear colourless or white e.g. group 1 and 2 salts: NaCl, MgBr2. Any colour present in such compounds is due to charge transfer since it involves transfer of an electron from an orbital localised on one ion to a second orbital localised on the other ion (most important for transition metal compounds).
In covalent compounds the electronegativity difference between the two atoms is small giving rise to molecular transitions of electrons and colour appears.
e.g.
SnF4 - SnCl4 - SnBr4 - SnI4
Colourless - Colourless -Yellow/Red - Orange
decreasing electronegativity difference between atoms.
Going down a group the HOMO and LUMO levels become closer resulting in colours.
e.g.
F2 Cl2 Br2 I2
Pale yellow Green-Yellow Red-Brown Violet
Flame Colours
Many metal salts are colourless unless anion is coloured (e.g. KMnO4). This is because the energy jump to promote electrons is too high for visible light (but possible for uv). All have characteristic flame colours since ions are reduced to atoms at high temperature in flame and population of numerous excited states is increased.
Li crimson, Na yellow, K violet, Rb red, Cs blue.
e.g. Na+ 1s22s22p6 3s0 Na 1s22s22p63s1 3p0
Ion: large transition Atom: smaller transition
\ no colour \ colour
This is the basis for the analytical determination
of many metals by atomic absorption spectroscopy.
Simple Compounds of the Main Group Elements
Simple compounds illustrate the trends outlined so far in the course.
General trend: ionic at bottom left and covalent molecular at top right separated by a diagonal band of polymeric (macromolecular). Consistent with differences in electronegativity between the elements.
Structures: ionic are lattices formed by the attraction of oppositely charged particles. e.g. NaF, CaF2.
Covalent Molecular: little or no aggregation between molecules (non-polar) so gases, liquids or low mp solids.


Liquid (polymer) - Solid (tetramer)
Note: As ox. state increases for a given element in a series of binary compounds there is a trend from ionic to polymeric to covalent.
Example - GeF2 is polymeric while GeF4 is molecular. This is consistent with an increase in ox. state on Ge resulting in higher electronegativity (more positively charged), i.e. Ge(IV) is closer in electronegativity to F than Ge(II), so more covalent character in GeF4 compared to GeF2.
Size is also important! GeF2 is only two coordinate and therefore space is available for further coordination (more likely to polymerise than GeF4).
(2) Oxides
Trend from ionic to polymeric to molecular is as
expected.
Groups 1 and 2 have lattice type structures and all of group 13 are polymeric.
In group 14 there is a stark contrast between CO/CO2 and SiO2 –gases versus hard polymeric solid. As mentioned previously, the strong multiple bonding between C and O leads to molecular species.
GeO2 is similar to SiO2 (as expected since they possess similar size and electronegativities).
SnO2 and PbO2 are polymeric but each metal has six nearest neighbours (larger atoms can accommodate more neighbours).
The lower oxidation states SnO and PbO show a movement
towards more ionic. SnO and PbO both consist of sheets of oxygens, where
a square of oxygen atoms is capped by metal atoms.

Group 15: Similar to group 14. All N oxides
are molecular and contain strong p
-bonding. Coordination number at N is three or less. At least eight molecular
oxides, NO, NO2, N2O3, N2O,
N2O4, N2O5, NO3 and
N4O (only discovered in 1998).

P oxides are all larger molecules with much weaker p -bonding influences. Polymers and also oligomers (discrete molecules containing three or more atoms of an element). Two common examples P4O6 and P4O10.
P4O6 P (III) P4O10 P (V)
Other forms of P4O10 are macromolecular based on above structure but linked together.
As4O6 and Sb4O6 adopt a similar discrete structure to P4O6 but also macromolecular 3D structures of edge sharing EO3 pyramids.
Bi2O3 is exclusively polymeric where Bi has a coordination number of 5.
Group16: Excellent example of vertical trends.
O2 and O3 both are gases with strong multiple bonding.
S is relatively small and therefore good overlap
of orbitals with O leads to strong multiple bonding. SO2 is
a molecular gas. However, SO3 is molecular in the gas phase
but solidifies as either a cyclotrimer or a polymeric helix.

SO2:

SO3:
Why is SO3 polymeric while SO2 is only molecular? This is different from GeF2 and GeF4 where the lower ox. state polymerised.
Rationalisation: (1) Three electron withdrawing O
atoms surrounding S induce a significantly high +ve charge on S to promote
bridging. Also, (2) Coordination number of S in SO3 is three
whereas Ge in GeF4 is four – more space available for further
coordination interactions in SO3 (coordinatively unsaturated).

SeO2 is exclusively polymeric (consistent with move to more polar/ionic as group is descended). Linear zig-zag structure.
SeO3 is a cyclotetramer (cf SO3).
TeO2 is polymeric with single Te-O bonds and a Te coordination number of 4. TeO3 is macromolecular containing TeO6 octahedra.
PoO2 is ionic with the fluorite structure. Po coordination number is eight.
Trend: Larger coordination number as group is descended:
1 for O2, 2 for SO2, 3 for SeO2, 4 for
TeO2 and 8 for PoO2. Now higher ox. states become
more polymeric (contrast with group 14!).
Group 17: Oxides of F, Cl and Br are molecular
and contain p -bonding.

Oxides of I are oligomers or polymers (consistent with larger size, greater difference in electronegativity).
I2O5 sheets containing bridged subunit below.

All oxides of groups 17 and 18 are thermodynamically unstable and decompose to their elements. However, they may be kinetically stable for some time – HAZARD may detonate!
Group 18: Only XeO3 and XeO4 which are both molecular are known.
General Tends for Oxides: Crossing table the heteronuclear
bond energies decrease (loss of ionic component to bonding).
(3) Macrocycles:
(a) Crowns and Cryptands
Conventional belief was that group 1 and 2 metal
ions M+ or M2+ have weak coordinating ability due
to large size and low charge. However, macrocyclic polyethers coordinated
strongly with M+ to form stable complexes in salts.

15-crown-5 and dibenzo-14-crown-4
The stability of the complex depends on the size
and shape of the cavity of the ligand compared to the size of M+.
| Cation | Ion Diameter (pm) | Crown | Hole-Size (pm) |
| Li+ | 152 | 14-crown-4 | 120-150 |
| Na+ | 204 | 15-crown-5 | 170-220 |
| K+ | 276 | 18-crown-6 | 260-320 |
| Rb+ | 304 | 21-crown-7 | 340-430 |
These complexes have covalent properties, low mp, soluble in organic solvents etc. X-ray data tells us the metal sits inside the cavity of the crown and the anion outside. In effect the ionic lattice has been broken down and the ionic nature of the metal is hidden by being imbedded in an organic sheath.
Cryptands are marcobicyclic compounds which have similar complexing properties to crowns except contain N/O/S/P heteroatoms.

The cryptand above captures Rb to form a bicapped trigonal prismatic structure.
Uses for crowns and cryptands include solvent extraction (excellent selectivity for ions) and phase transfer catalysis. They are also used as model compounds to mimic biological systems i.e. the transfer of Na/K between cell membranes. Crowns and crypts also form strong complexes with group 2 metals.
(b) Porphyrins
Nitrogen containing macrocycles. Commonly found in
nature (haemoglobin).

Chlorophyll is a substituted porphyrin with a Mg
atom lying in the centre (used in photosynthesis). Chlorophyll absorbs
red light and passes this energy onto other chemical intermediates in a
cell. Magnesium bonds to all four nitrogens (Lewis bases) and its function
includes keeping the macrocycle flat to allow stacking of many molecules.
Highlights of Group Trends
Group 1
Group 17